The project explores how new forms of habitable infrastructure might be
extrapolated from a geopolitical agreement – in this case,
materializing architectural form from the legal interstices of the Oslo Accords.
The result is a fantastic example of architectural speculation: genuinely massive – and impossibly cantilevered – bridges used as transport links, aerial housing, and skyborne agricultural complexes, all in one.
While clearly defying security protocols, as the "continuous enclave" and its network of bridges cross through sovereign Israeli airspace, these structures would link the dispersed islands of infrastructurally underserved territory now under Palestinian control.
From Ramos's own project description:
"The Oslo Accords," Ramos continues, "have been integral to this process of division."
To my mind, the project avoids the most obvious and expected pitfall of such an approach – which would be to suggest, naively, that architecture can, in and of itself, lead to a more thorough and lasting peace in the region, as if the entirety of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict would be eradicated if only they had better architecture.
Ramos instead uses the Oslo Accords as a kind of spatial source-code from which unanticipated structural forms might be extracted.
For those of you who have read Delirious New York, it's as if the Oslo Accords have been turned into a geopolitically active 1916 Zoning Law. That law, of course, established spatial guidelines – for instance, enforcing setbacks for buildings, leading to an era in which skyscrapers rose up like ever-narrowing ziggurats – from which the buildings of Manhattan would then be shaped.
As Koolhaas himself writes, in the wake of the Zoning Law architects would "have to carve the final Manhattan archetype from the invisible rock of its zoning envelope in a campaign of specification."
In Ramos's project, that "invisible rock" consists of disputed territorial claims hovering virtually over the geography of the West Bank. The distinct new form of spatiality "carved" from that rock is the bypass.
Again, from the project description:
There are any number of other directions such a project could go, but I'm particularly excited by the idea of applying this same sort of analysis to other conflict zones, elsewhere, all over the world.
Of course, the precedents for this are many. After all, what is the Berlin Wall but a piece of architecture pulled from the dreamscape of international legal infrastructure?
In fact, I'm reminded here of Rupert Thomson's under-appreciated recent novel Divided Kingdom – especially because the basic premise of that book was at least partially inspired by Rem Koolhaas's own student thesis project, Exodus, or The Voluntary Prisoners of Architecture. As Koolhaas wrote:
But what new kinds of space might we yet extract from territorial agreements between, say, India and Pakistan over Kashmir, or Turkey and Greece over Nicosia – or, for that matter, what strange infrastructures might we build in Baarle-Hertog, what pavilions inspired by the Akwizgran Discrepancy, and how might most interestingly extract architecture from the international date line?
Even with so many precedents, it would seem, such studies have still barely begun.
You can see much, much larger versions of all of these images in this Flickr set: The Continuous Enclave: Strategies in Bypass Urbanism. They are incredibly detailed and well worth exploring in full!
from bldgblog
The result is a fantastic example of architectural speculation: genuinely massive – and impossibly cantilevered – bridges used as transport links, aerial housing, and skyborne agricultural complexes, all in one.
While clearly defying security protocols, as the "continuous enclave" and its network of bridges cross through sovereign Israeli airspace, these structures would link the dispersed islands of infrastructurally underserved territory now under Palestinian control.
From Ramos's own project description:
-
This
thesis takes a formal approach to understanding the Israeli-Palestinian
conflict by studying mechanisms of control within the West Bank. The
occupation of the West Bank has had tremendous effects on the urban
fabric of the region because it operates spatially. Through the
conflict, new ways of imagining territory have been needed to multiply
a single sovereign territory into many. It is only through the
overlapping of two separate political geographies that they are able to
inhabit the same landscape.
"The Oslo Accords," Ramos continues, "have been integral to this process of division."
-
By
defining various control regimes, the Accords have created a fragmented
landscape of isolated Palestinian enclaves and Israeli settlements. The
intertwined nature of these fragments makes it impossible to divide the
two states easily. By connecting the fragments through a series of
under- and overpasses, the border between the two states has shifted
vertically.
To my mind, the project avoids the most obvious and expected pitfall of such an approach – which would be to suggest, naively, that architecture can, in and of itself, lead to a more thorough and lasting peace in the region, as if the entirety of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict would be eradicated if only they had better architecture.
Ramos instead uses the Oslo Accords as a kind of spatial source-code from which unanticipated structural forms might be extracted.
For those of you who have read Delirious New York, it's as if the Oslo Accords have been turned into a geopolitically active 1916 Zoning Law. That law, of course, established spatial guidelines – for instance, enforcing setbacks for buildings, leading to an era in which skyscrapers rose up like ever-narrowing ziggurats – from which the buildings of Manhattan would then be shaped.
As Koolhaas himself writes, in the wake of the Zoning Law architects would "have to carve the final Manhattan archetype from the invisible rock of its zoning envelope in a campaign of specification."
In Ramos's project, that "invisible rock" consists of disputed territorial claims hovering virtually over the geography of the West Bank. The distinct new form of spatiality "carved" from that rock is the bypass.
Again, from the project description:
-
One feature of the Oslo Accords
is the bypass road which links Israeli settlements to Israel, bypassing
Palestinian areas in the process. These are essential to the freedom of
movement for the settlers within the Occupied Territories.
Extrapolating on the bypass, this thesis explores the ramifications of
a continuous infrastructural network linking the fragmented landscape
of Palestinian enclaves. In the process, a continuous form of
urbanization has been developed to allow for the growth and expansion
of the Palestinian state. Ultimately, this thesis questions the
potential absurdity of partition strategies within the West Bank and
Gaza Strip by attempting to realize them.
There are any number of other directions such a project could go, but I'm particularly excited by the idea of applying this same sort of analysis to other conflict zones, elsewhere, all over the world.
Of course, the precedents for this are many. After all, what is the Berlin Wall but a piece of architecture pulled from the dreamscape of international legal infrastructure?
In fact, I'm reminded here of Rupert Thomson's under-appreciated recent novel Divided Kingdom – especially because the basic premise of that book was at least partially inspired by Rem Koolhaas's own student thesis project, Exodus, or The Voluntary Prisoners of Architecture. As Koolhaas wrote:
-
Once,
a city was divided in two parts. One part became the Good Half, the
other part the Bad Half. The inhabitants of the Bad Half began to flock
to the good part of the divided city, rapidly swelling into an urban
exodus. If this situation had been allowed to continue forever, the
population of the Good Half would have doubled, while the Bad Half
would have turned into a ghost town. After all attempts to interrupt
this undesirable migration had failed, the authorities of the bad part
made desperate and savage use of architecture: they built a wall around
the good part of the city, making it completely inaccessible to their
subjects.
The Wall was a masterpiece.
But what new kinds of space might we yet extract from territorial agreements between, say, India and Pakistan over Kashmir, or Turkey and Greece over Nicosia – or, for that matter, what strange infrastructures might we build in Baarle-Hertog, what pavilions inspired by the Akwizgran Discrepancy, and how might most interestingly extract architecture from the international date line?
Even with so many precedents, it would seem, such studies have still barely begun.
You can see much, much larger versions of all of these images in this Flickr set: The Continuous Enclave: Strategies in Bypass Urbanism. They are incredibly detailed and well worth exploring in full!
from bldgblog
'Landscape' 카테고리의 다른 글
Ten Scenarios for ‘Grand Paris’ Metropolis Now Up for Public Debate (0) | 2009.03.17 |
---|---|
[ Langdon Reis Zahn’s ] Library and Concert Hall Competition in Bodø (0) | 2009.03.12 |
[ MVRDV ] Shenzhen 4 Tower in 1 Competition CBD TREES (0) | 2009.03.10 |
[ drdharchitects ] library and concert hall competition in Norway (0) | 2009.03.10 |
Lighting up the night (0) | 2009.03.04 |