복원? 재현? 과거의 시간을 현재의 공간에 투영하는 방법에는 어떠한 것들이 있을까요?
과거의 영광을 뒤로 한채 흔적만 남아 있는 르네상스 시대의 성터 복원 프로젝트는
과거의 형태에 집착하지 않습니다. 프로젝트의 시작은 장소성 인지에서 부터 시작합니다.
과거의 시간이 소중한 만큼 현재의 시간-과러로 부터 모든 것들 반영된 결과물-이 담겨진 공간을
인정합니다. 그리고 폐허로 남겨진 시간의 흔적들을 읽을 수 있도록 설치물을 계획합니다.
과거 건축물이 서 있던 자리를 대신하는 코르텐강 벤치와 성곽 한모퉁이를 차지하는
전망대는 그렇게 최소한의 개입으로 과거를 복원합니다.
전망대의 좁다란 계단실을 따라 올라간 전망대에서 보이는 성곽터는 굳이 재현하지 않아도
남겨진 성벽과 새롭게 만들어진 그루터기로 우리들의 상상 속에 새롭게 펼쳐집니다.
그런데도 굳이 깨끗하게 다듬어진 돌무더기를 쌓아서 성을 완성할 필요가 있을까요?
reviewed by SJ
Budapest architects MARP have replaced the missing corner of a ruined Renaissance palace with a Corten steel lookout point.
The L-shaped structure is part of a renovation of the ancient site in
the city of Pécs, Hungary, which was almost completely destroyed. The
architects stabilised the site and added new elements, including the
lookout point, a low-level stage for open-air theatre and Corten steel
seating blocks.
“We chose Corten steel as the primary material of our intervention to make the new structures significantly distinguishable from the older parts,” architect Márton Dévényi told Dezeen. ”The old remaining structures had been so incomplete for centuries that we did not want to rebuild them, we preferred to show their absence.”
Architects: Marp, Budapest Márton Dévényi, Pál Gyürki-Kiss
Assistants: Ádám Holicska, Dávid Loszmann
Landscape planning: S73, Budapest Dr. Péter István Balogh, Sándor Mohácsi, János Hómann
Structural engineering: Marosterv, Pécs József Maros, Gergely Maros
Steel construction planner: J.Reilly, Budapest Zoltán V. Nagy, Péter Bokor
Electrical Planning: LM-Terv, Pécs Gábor Lénárt
Mechanical services: Pécsi Mélyépítő Iroda, Pécs Erzsébet Bruckner, Ferenc Müller
Competition phase: 2007
Design phase: 2008-2010
Construction: 2009-2011
Gross area: 1040 m2
Client: City of Pécs
The lookout point offers vistas over the Tettye valley, similar to those that the original two-storey palace would have enjoyed, while an aperture in the steel wall frames views of the internal courtyard.
Visitors ascend a staircase hidden within one wall and emerge on a walkway that runs along the length of the adjoining wall. A perforated pattern allows light to permeate the structure and filter into the staircase.
The reconstruction of the Szatmáry Palace
The existing ruins of the renaissance Szathmáry Palace is one of
Hungary’s most valuable protected monuments. The palace is situated in
the city of Pécs which is one of the oldest town of the southwestern
region of Hungary with long historical background. The ruins are located
in a park of Tettye Valley in the northeast part of the city, where the
dense historical urban fabric meets nature. The valley rises almost
from the heart of the city, offering a magnificent view of the city from
the top. Bishop György Szathmáry (1457-1524) built his own Renaissance
style summer residence here at the very beginning of the 16th century.
The palace must have been a two-storey building with inner patio, made
of local stone. It was said to have been a U-shaped building arranged
around a courtyard open towards the South, that is to say, towards the
city. A former archeological excavation confirmed that the Bishop of
Pécs had a building with inner courtyard built that was rebuilt a number
of times later. During the long occupation of Hungary by the Ottoman
Empire from the mid-16th century, the palace housed probably a Turkish
dervish cloister. This is when the south-east tower must have been built
that is still untouched. After the Ottomans had been driven away, the
building was left empty and its condition became worse and worse. At the
beginning of the 20th century, one part of the building was demolished,
and certain openings were strengthened with arches, thus providing a
sense of romantic ruin aesthetics. Until recently the ruin was used as a
background scene for a summer theatre. Despite the long history and its
superb location, the palace in its bad condition was not able to fulfil
the proper role following from its historical and architectural
importance.
In 2010, it was Pécs, Essen and Istanbul that were awarded the title of
European Capital of Culture. As part of this, a priority project
focussed on the renewal of public areas including Tettye Park. This
project provided an opportunity to put the ruin in a new context and the
park could be present in its redefined way as a whole. The ruin in its
dense complexity carries a number of qualities, therefore the designers
of the intervention studied the current context and condition of the
ruin as a starting point.
The Szathmáry Palace are, mostly, ruins of a building, but today this
quality does not say too much in itself. It does not particularly
reflect a significant renassaince feature. Obviously it lacks the
architectural details we know very little about (few of the renaissance
stone fragments kept in Pécs can be attributed to the building in
Tettye). So it can be said that the architectural reality of the ruins
continue to exist through the spatial relations generated by the remains
of the wall. However, this shows a very mixed picture caused by natural
and human erosion. The volume of damage at the southeast corner is so
big that one can hardly picture the supplement of the ruins.
At the same time, the badly damaged ruin, particularly due to the
neglected state of the park, appeared as a picturesque landscape element
in the valley of Tettye. Pre-war postcards represent the atmosphere of a
nice, picturesque tourist destination which undeniably rule the whole
landscape. However, the abandoned park began to re-conquer the ruin so
much that during high season, the character of the ruin can hardly be
made out. From certain angles, it looked like a geological creature.
This feeling has still remained if one looks at the ruin closely due to
the intense erosion of the former southern side of the building. The
image of the picturesque ruin is emphasised by the strengthening arches
made through the early 20th century.
The third important peculiarity about the building is that the
originally closed inner space of the palace has continued to be part of
the park’s public areas today, dissolving the former differentiation
between the landscape and the building. Thus the ruin has gained a
public space quality in the meantime. Interestingly enough, the open-air
performances of the summer theatre set in the ruins emphasised this
feature even more.
The reconstruction programme of the Tettye Park basically made it
unavoidable to re-define the role of the palace ruin as an emphatic
landscape element and architectural monument. When defining the
interventions, our main aim was to avoid overwriting the intellectual
layers as well as the quality resulting from the ruin’s complexity. The
starting point was to accept the existence of these even if the layers
were developed either through centuries or just a few decades. At the
same time, it was unavoidable to revise and ’retune’ the quality and the
meanings carried by the ruin.
During the course of the architectural interventions, together with the
monument protection authority, the ruin’s wholescale floorplan and its
partial spatial reconstruction was carried out based on the scientific
results of the archaeological excavations that preceded the design
phase. During the excavation, the base walls of the southern wing
believed to have been missing for a long time were discovered, which
seemed to support the hypothesis that the building did not have a
U-shape. As a result of the excavations, we were now able to draw the
ascending wall parts and construct the original floorplan. What we
basically did during the reconstruction of the floorplan was to repair
the floor level inside the external outline of the whole of the original
ruins, and we also attached retaining walls along the eroded southern
side and the south-eastern corner, behind which we filled up the eroded
ground up to the floor level. This supporting wall has a stabilising
role in stopping the erosion that resulted in the sliding. The original
floorplan is marked by the walltrace.
During the local spatial reconstruction, we designed an L-shaped, steel
structure building part that had been missing from the south-eastern
side, which includes a look-out tower and stairs leading to it, as well
as a technical facility required for theatre use. It is important to
mention that the new construction did not mean to be a formal
reconstruction (the latter one was not an aim in fact and the amount of
data that was available was insufficient), therefore it does not repeat
the original mass properly. What happened instead was that we wanted to
create such a mass in the place of the former wall corner that
strengthens the building character of the ruin as opposed to its ruin
character, framing the city view along with the current corner
resembling it to the act of viewing out of a building. On the territory
of the ruin, no more reconstructions were done, that is to say, we did
not mean to ’complete’ the ruin. Evidently, the look-out tower offers a
fascinating view of the city, but at the same time there is a nice view
too to the inner part of the ruin, making the floor plan reconstruction
neat and revealing.
As a part of the floor plan reconstruction, we re-defined the ground
surfaces inside the outer walls of Palace, referring the former usage of
spaces: the inner patio became a green lawn zone, while the other older
inner areas, where the inner rooms were, received a surface course of
mineral rubble of local stone granulations. As part of the
interpretation of the ruin’s space as a public space, we applied
surfaces that refer to the current public space use rather than to the
original floor carpet. In the former inner space of the ruin’s Western
wing, a new carpet-like stage was completed for theatrical purposes,
rising above the surface level very slightly. The new corner
construction, the stage and the street furniture (sitting facilities)
all received the same Corten steel carpet.
As part of the reconstruction of Tettye Park, both the ruin’s immediate
and distant environment have been renewed. Having replanted the green
area around the ruin, the formerly covered, fragmented building that
could be characterised as a more unified, magnificent whole has managed
to regain some of its original character. We also managed to restore
both the physical and intellectual layers that contribute to the ruin’s
complexity through applied interventions. It was also an aim to rather
define new directions to its future destiny when we placed the parts
endowed with the remaining meanings in a new context. Furthermore, the
whole area could become a new, exciting part of the city context, in
which the re-defined palace ruin plays an outstanding role. Through the
re-arrangement of the green surroundings, which included the removal of
the traffic located south of the ruin, we created a triple terrace
system that defines the centre of the Tettye valley in this place again.
from dezeen
'Pavilion&Installation' 카테고리의 다른 글
*호수위의 예배당 [ Divece Arquitectos ] Lake Chapel (0) | 2012.10.05 |
---|---|
*버블버블 빌딩 [ DUS Architects ] Bubble Building (0) | 2012.09.21 |
*베니스 비엔날레 2012, 러시아 파빌리온 [ SPEECH Techoban,Kuznetsov ] Venice Biennale 2012 i-city_Russia Pavilion (0) | 2012.09.16 |
*숲속의 코르텐 스틸 스튜디오[ Johnsen Schmaling Architects ] Studio for a Composer (0) | 2012.09.15 |
*대나무 중정 티하우스 [ HWCD Associates ] Bamboo Courtyard Teahouse (0) | 2012.09.13 |